On the take βœ‹πŸ’°

Meaning

Accepting bribes or engaging in dishonest or illegal activities, especially by someone in a position of authority.

Origin

The phrase "on the take" emerged in the mid-19th century, likely originating in the world of petty crime and gambling. Imagine a crooked casino dealer or a shady bookie discreetly pocketing a portion of the earnings or accepting a gratuity to look the other way. This act of receiving money illicitly, of being "on" a particular "take" or share, became synonymous with corruption. It painted a vivid picture of someone actively participating in dishonest gain, their hand reaching into the pot of ill-gotten gains.

On the take represented with emojiβœ‹πŸ’°

This playful arrangement of a hand reaching for money, βœ‹πŸ’°, serves as a charmingly direct visual pun for the phrase 'on the take.' It functions as a whimsical yet clear depiction of corruption, inviting a moment of lighthearted reflection on a decidedly less-than-lighthearted topic.

Examples

  • The inspector was suspected of being on the take, leading to a full investigation.
  • If the mayor is on the take, the whole town will be furious.
  • The potion vendor was rumored to be on the take, making his elixirs suspiciously effective.
  • Even the royal guard, it was whispered, might be on the take, if the price of dragon scales was high enough.

Frequently asked questions

What's the opposite of 'on the take'?

The opposite of being 'on the take' is being honest or principled, as in someone who refuses bribes and acts with integrity. While there isn't one single antonym, phrases like 'clean' or 'upright' convey the contrast to corruption.

Is 'on the take' a recent idiom?

No, the idiom 'on the take' dates back to the mid-19th century. Its origins are thought to be in the world of petty crime and gambling, referring to someone illicitly pocketing a share of earnings.

Can 'on the take' be used for minor dishonesty?

While primarily associated with significant corruption like bribery, 'on the take' can sometimes be used for less severe dishonest acts, especially if they involve illicit gain through a position of trust. The core idea remains receiving money or benefits dishonestly.

Who would be caught 'on the take'?

Anyone in a position of power or authority who is accepting bribes or illicit payments could be described as 'on the take'. This includes politicians, law enforcement officials, or business people who abuse their influence for personal financial gain.